| HR | Lower_CI | Upper_CI | pvalue | modelname | source | type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.71 | 0.52 | 0.97 | 0.030 | log(ACoA) | external melanoma | pfs |
| 0.81 | 0.62 | 1.06 | 0.117 | log(Ruminococcaceae) | external melanoma | pfs |
| 0.67 | 0.43 | 1.04 | 0.072 | log(Ruminococcacaeae + Lachnospiraceae) | external melanoma | pfs |
| 0.64 | 0.39 | 1.03 | 0.064 | log(Clostridiales) | external melanoma | pfs |
| 0.70 | 0.45 | 1.09 | 0.112 | log(Clostridia) | external melanoma | pfs |
| 0.97 | 0.93 | 1.01 | 0.134 | log(F prausnitizii + 1e-7) | external melanoma | pfs |
Table 9
Here are the column names of the data we are plotting:
fouraminobutyrate, glutarate, lysine and pyruvate represent different parts of the butyrate synthesis pathway.
Panel E MSK Data
Univariate Cox regression analyses PFS relationship to ACoA gene abundance in MSK Observational Data.
| HR | Lower_CI | Upper_CI | pvalue | modelname | source | type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.59 | 0.38 | 0.90 | 0.015 | log(ACoA) | mixed solid tumor | pfs |
| 1.03 | 0.79 | 1.35 | 0.825 | log(Ruminococcaceae) | mixed solid tumor | pfs |
| 0.77 | 0.46 | 1.28 | 0.316 | log(Ruminococcacaeae + Lachnospiraceae) | mixed solid tumor | pfs |
| 0.79 | 0.46 | 1.36 | 0.391 | log(Clostridiales) | mixed solid tumor | pfs |
| 0.83 | 0.49 | 1.41 | 0.488 | log(Clostridia) | mixed solid tumor | pfs |
| 0.99 | 0.94 | 1.05 | 0.764 | log(F prausnitizii + 1e-7) | mixed solid tumor | pfs |
| HR | Lower_CI | Upper_CI | pvalue | modelname | source | type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.40 | 0.24 | 0.66 | 0.000 | log(ACoA) | mixed solid tumor | os |
| 0.96 | 0.71 | 1.29 | 0.774 | log(Ruminococcaceae) | mixed solid tumor | os |
| 0.45 | 0.25 | 0.81 | 0.008 | log(Ruminococcacaeae + Lachnospiraceae) | mixed solid tumor | os |
| 0.43 | 0.23 | 0.80 | 0.008 | log(Clostridiales) | mixed solid tumor | os |
| 0.58 | 0.31 | 1.06 | 0.076 | log(Clostridia) | mixed solid tumor | os |
| 0.95 | 0.89 | 1.01 | 0.126 | log(F prausnitizii + 1e-7) | mixed solid tumor | os |